I don't know this particular game you are showing images from, but I can definitely say that the other games I've played a ton of are more accurate in MAME (if they aren't buggy, anyways). That's why you're saying "any 3D emu" looks better than MAME, they are all applying higher resolution 3D, texture smoothing, etc. Zinc is doing things like using higher resolution textures, texture filtering, higher resolution 3D, etc. With the exception of some filtering seen in your screenshot there, that is indeed how the games looked in the arcade. MAME is using software rendering for accuracy whereas Zinc is not. I've played most of these 3D arcade games to death. I'll agree with you on the setup being far less problematic than people say. You mustn't have played a lot 3D games in the arcade if you think the way Mame currently renders them is accurate, that's not how the originals looked. The end result (to me at least) is worth it. The 'well-known' issue with Zinc is that it can be difficult to setup but it's not as daunting as some people make it out to be, plenty of resources floating around to make it simpler. I've been using Zinc for many years and have never heard of it randomly deleting files or had that happen to me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |